Saturday, January 28, 2012

Chinese iPhone assemblers like battery hens...

Yellow suits are managers, QC is in pink. The ...
Image via Wikipedia
CUPERTINO, CA - OCTOBER 04:  Apple CEO Tim Coo...
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Image representing iPhone as depicted in Crunc...
Image via CrunchBase

Ads

:no:aVquZxYZFNCMtFp-180x118-cropped
Chinese iPhone assemblers like battery hens...
According to the New York Times, workers at a factory in Shenzhen, China, owned by Foxconn (a company that manufactures iPhones, iPads and other devices for Apple) regularly work sixteen-hour, seven-day work weeks.
They stand until their legs swell and they can’t walk, and they perform repetitive motions on the production line for so long that some permanently lose the use of their hands. To cut costs, managers make workers use cheap chemicals that cause neurological damage. There has been a rash of suicides at the Foxconn plant, and 300 workers recently threatened to jump off the roof over a safety and pay dispute.
In short, as one former Apple executive told the New York Times, "Most people would be really disturbed if they saw where their iPhone comes from."
Mark Shields, a self-described member of the "cult of Mac," started a petition on Change.org demanding Apple exert its influence on its suppliers to improve working conditions for the factory workers that make iPhones, iPads and other Apple products. Click here to sign Mark’s petition right now.
Apple knows it can play an important role in ensuring safe and fair working conditions for the workers at its suppliers, like Foxconn. In 2005, the company released a supplier code of conduct, and it performs hundreds of audits each year in China and around the world to confirm its suppliers are meeting the code’s expectations.
But that’s where Apple’s commitment falters: the number of supplier violations has held steady year to year and Apple hasn’t consistently publicly stated which suppliers have problems or dropped offending suppliers.
The bottom line, Apple executives admit, is that they’re not being forced to change.
One current executive told the New York Times that there’s a trade-off: "You can either manufacture in comfortable, worker-friendly factories," he said, or you can "make it better and faster and cheaper, which requires factories that seem harsh by American standards. And right now, customers care more about a new iPhone than working conditions in China."
That means public pressure is the only thing that can force Apple to ensure its suppliers treat workers humanely. If enough people sign Mark’s petition -- and tell Apple they care more about human beings than they do about how fast the company can produce the next generation iPhone -- the company could be convinced to make real change for the workers at Foxconn and other factories.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Monsanto now owns Blackwater XE...

English: Erik D. Prince (born June 6, 1969), a...
Image via Wikipedia
English: Anti-Xe/Blackwater logotype
Image via Wikipedia
English: A Blackwater Security Company MD-530F...
Image via Wikipedia
U.S. Army Soldiers conduct a test near Kabul, ...
Image via Wikipedia
Blackwater NWR
Image by Bird Brian via Flickr
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Wikipedia site blackout has been confirmed - democratic rights at stake...

NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 26:  (L-R) Keynote speake...
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Cover of Martin Luther King, Jr.
  •  
    :**:50a73b7cd3855c31bdbd73c3eb56e7bc_largejimmywales_220x147
    Wikipedia confirms site blackout over piracy rule...

  • Jimmy Wales the founder of Wikipedia the free online knowledge site, will shut it down for 24 hours later this week in protest at the draft anti-online piracy legislation before the US Congress, he said on Twitter.
    "'Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.' MLK - on Wednesday, Wikipedia demands," Wales said, citing slain US civil rights leader Martin Luther King.
    The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is currently before the House of Representatives, while the Protect IP Act is the version before the Senate.
    The draft legislation has won the backing of Hollywood, the music industry, the Business Software Alliance, the National Association of Manufacturers and the US Chamber of Commerce.
    But last month, the founders of Google, Twitter, Wikipedia, Yahoo! and other internet giants expressed concern over the two drafts, saying in a open letter that they would "give the US government the power to censor the Web using techniques similar to those used by China, Malaysia and Iran.
    Kiwipete says: Is this a genuine attempt to stop online piracy like the much criticised New Zealand legislation passed last year, or some sort of "trojan horse" to enable the US Government to control what's published on the internet sometime in the future or whenever some corporation or politician objects? Democratic freedoms had to be won dearly and should not be rationed out at the whim of some potentially fascist politician or corporate CEO. Other nations would soon follow the lead of the 'land of the free'. Is this another sign of what's to come in 2012?
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10779466
  • Kiwipete
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Fears of Israeli attack on Iran mount...

Official photographic portrait of US President...
Image via Wikipedia
English: Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli politician
Image via Wikipedia

 

Visit comes as U.S. attempts to determine Israel's intentions with regard to a possible attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.

                          
Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, is scheduled to arrive in Israel on Thursday for talks with Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz, and other senior defense and intelligence officials.
The visit comes as the United States attempts to coordinate with Israel on the issue of Iran's nuclear capabilities, and to determine Israel's intentions with regard to a possible attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Gen. Martin Dempsey - AP - December 2011Joint Chiefs Chairman Army Gen. Martin Dempsey speaks about "Security and Partnership in an Age of Austerity," Friday, Dec. 9, 2011.
Photo by: AP
Dempsey may also meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Ahead of Dempsey's visit, the Wall Street Journal published statements by senior American officers who said the United States had increased preparations for a possible Israeli attack on Iran. They also said the United States has refreshed plans for defending American installations in the Middle East in the event of a retaliation by Iran.
One senior officer told the Wall Street Journal that the United States' concerns regarding a possible Israeli attack on Iran were increasing.
In November, following a visit to Israel by U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Haaretz reported that Netanyahu and Barak had refused to vow against attacking Iran without first coordinating with the United States.
According to the Wall Street Journal, both U.S. President Barack Obama and Panetta have conveyed messages through quiet channels to senior Israeli officials regarding the serious implications of an Israeli attack on Iran. They also reportedly told Israel it should allow more time for sanctions on Iran to take effect.
In the meantime, the United States is preparing for various scenarios following an Israeli attack on Iran, senior American officials reportedly told the Wall Street Journal. These include an attack by Shi'ites in Iraq on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. There are currently 15,000 U.S. citizens in Iraq.
Dempsey's visit to Israel also comes against the backdrop of increased tension between Iran and the West over Tehran's threats to close the Straits of Hormuz, which would compromise oil shipments to the West, and threats to avenge the recent assassination of an Iraqi nuclear scientist on Wednesday. The regime is accusing Israel, the United States and Britain of the assassination.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has denied responsibility for the attack. Israeli President Shimon Peres said Israel had no role in the attack, to the best of his knowledge.
The spokesman for Iran's Joint Armed Forces Staff, Massoud Jazayeri, said: "Our enemies, especially America, Britain and the Zionist regime [Israel], have to be held responsible for their actions." According to a report in the New York Times on Friday, senior American officials said Obama recently told the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khameneii, via a secret channel that closing the Straits of Hormuz would constitute crossing a "red line." Obama reportedly said such an action would draw a severe American response.
Also this weekend, Netanyahu said in an interview with the Weekend Australian that he believed the strong sanctions against Iran were damaging the regime in Tehran. He said he thought a combination of the sanctions and the threat of U.S. military action against its nuclear facilities could force Iran to back down.
Netanyahu said the Iranian economy was "showing clear signs of stress."
"For the first time," he said, "I see Iran wobble under the sanctions that have been adopted and especially under the threat of strong sanctions on their central bank."
Netanyahu's remarks notwithstanding, a senior Israeli official told Haaretz yesterday that there was disappointment in Jerusalem over the fact that harsher sanctions have not been imposed on Iran.
"Without sanctions on Iran's central bank and on its oil exports, the regime will not back down and will not stop its nuclear program," the official said.
Read this article in Hebrew
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

US Congress wants dictatorial control over Internet...

Ask gaming company Electronic Arts to oppose the Internet censorship bill.
Sign the Petition
Breaking news:  Hello free world...

Congress has a plan to change the Internet forever. A bill they're debating right now would give the government power to shut down whole websites, and even let corporations say which websites should be shut down.
That means a huge corporation could have any website even suspected of violating a copyright shut down -- no questions asked. The government could then completely block all access to sites as big as Facebook or YouTube if one person posts one thing on those websites that corporations don't want online.
Most major entertainment companies have come out in support of the bill, but despite swirling rumors, the huge video-gaming company Electronic Arts (EA) has yet to take an official stance. However, EA is part of the Entertainment Software Association, one of the big corporate lobbyists for the bill to censor the Internet -- meaning that if EA came out against the bill, that would be a serious blow to the people trying to get it passed


Turkey internet ban protest 2011
Image via Wikipedia
http://myvikaroti.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/congress-has-a-plan-to-change-the-internet-forever/

http://by152w.bay152.mail.live.com/?n=1929130864&rru=inbox&fid=1&fav=1&mid=aef1fa2d-3c0f-11e1-bae5-00215ad9dfd2&fv=1#!/?rru=inbox

Read much more below:
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, January 08, 2012

Codex Alimentarius in New Zealand - the food police...

English: Template for Template:Food safety
Image via Wikipedia

Chemical Food Cosh, by amazing artist and homeopath Gina Tyler, http:ginatyler.com (with the words, "Chemical Food Cosh", added)
Chemical Food Cosh, by amazing artist and homeopath Gina Tyler, http:ginatyler.com (with the words, "Chemical Food Cosh", added)
In New Zealand, the goals of Codex Alimentarius are being implemented at a rate that can only make the technocrats of the US and EU envious. Proposed legislation—thus far sliding through the legislative process like a greased pig—will force controls on food production that can only favor multinational growers and threaten the existence of all small operations. It treats foods as a commodity and eliminates the presumption that people can grow and access their foods of choice.
Rather than being something we all understand and come to comprehend through the learning process that brings us to adulthood, food is redefined. According to the Food Safety Bill, food will no longer simply be “food”, it will become “food and food related products“. Food related products?
With the implementation of Food Bill 160-2, massive new powers, including powers of arrest, will be given to “food safety officers”, who can be members of the private sector. That means employees of Monsanto could be authorized to conduct raids. Worse, they will be given immunity from criminal and civil prosecution for any acts during those raids. Even marae, communal and sacred places, will be subject to their actions. Warrants will not be required so there will be no need for evidence of a crime, meaning anyone could be raided at any time…and there will be no recourse, no matter how egregious their acts.

Codex Alimentarius: The Reason for the Food Bill

The purpose of the bill—as stated by New Zealand Food Safety Authority—is to bring New Zealand into line with Codex Alimentarius provisions. It is the goal of Codex Alimentarius to bring the entire world under subjugation by multinational corporate agribusiness.
  • They will define what food is.
  • They will decide what we can and cannot eat.
  • They will determine what we can and cannot know.
  • They will control what we put in our bodies.
  • Their will cannot be opposed, because they will have absolute power—with no means to check them with either criminal or civil sanctions.
  • They will not even need the approval of courts: raids will not require a warrant.
They will enforce their control through whatever means they choose—and they will define their arena of control as they choose.
It’s being sold as needed for food safety—but the fact is that any need for such measures exists only because of modern factory farming and factory food production methods. Until their advent, food was simply food. We knew how to take care of it. We knew how to grow it. We knew what was healthy. Now, though, food has been redefined as conglomerations of chemicals, divorced from their original living sources.
And we will soon have no option but to accept it—unless you act now.

New Zealand’s Food Safety Authority

New Zealand Food Safety Authority
Images from New Zealand Food Safety Authority website
The images on the left were taken from the New Zealand Food Safety Authority website’s home page. They were interspersed with heartwarming food images, like one of a beekeeper, but they reveal exactly how they view food. To the authorities, food isn’t life-giving nutrition, a gift from nature. No, to them food is combinations of chemicals, put together in whatever fashion multinational corporations choose, sterilized and purified, denatured, fortified, and whatever chemicals they try to put into it because their processing has destroyed anything related to the life-giving gifts of Gaia.
New Zealand’s Food Safety Authority is already making arrangements to implement and promote the Food Bill, as if it were already in effect. Their website actively promotes Codex Alimentarius, saying that, “Codex plays a pivotal role in developing international standards for health protection and ensuring fair practices in food trade.” Notice the conjunction of health protection and fair practices? That’s no accident. Codex uses the excuse of health protection to cram “fair practices” for agribusiness down our throats.
Make no mistake about it: The purpose of Codex Alimentarius and its implementation by New Zealand and nearly every other country in the world has nothing to do with our health. It’s all about making the world safe for agribusiness—to give them complete control over what we eat, even to the point of defining what food is, so that nothing can stand in the way of making and increasing their profits. That’s why “food safety officers” will be immune from civil and criminal prosecution. They’ll be above the law, able to walk into your business—or simply claim that your home is a business and walk in—and take whatever they wish, damage whatever they wish, hold you at gunpoint, and arrest you. You will have no recourse.

Everyone Is Affected

The Food Bill will affect everyone. As NZ Food Security.org says:
  • It turns a human right (to grow food and share it) into a government-authorised privilege that can be summarily revoked.
  • It makes it illegal to distribute “food” without authorisation, and it defines “food” in such a way that it includes nutrients, seeds, natural medicines, essential minerals and drinks (including water).
  • By controlling seeds, the bill takes the power to grow food away from the public and puts it in the hands of seed companies. That power may be abused. [That power will be abused! --Editor]
  • The bill will push up mainstream food prices by subjecting producers to red tape and registration costs.
  • Growing food for distribution must be authorised, even for “cottage industries”, and such authorisation can be denied.
  • The Food Bill means that non-Codex-complying producers can be shut down easily – thus it paves the way for the legal enforcement of Codex food regulations. Producers will be denied registration (which is discretionary) if they do not keep to Codex food production rules.
The knock-on effects could include:
  • Loss of ability to be self-sufficient.
  • Potential loss of seed banks if they can’t gain authorization—and what’s the likelihood of Monsanto going along with that?
  • Bartering becoming difficult or illegal, just as the costs of buying food goes up because of added costs and fees.
  • Loss of heirloom seeds—an agricultural disaster.
  • Loss of organic food.
NZ Food Security provides a wealth of information on these issues. Please, take a look.

Can This Travesty Be Stopped?

The question is, will enough people see the danger and act? It’s up to you. A good start is to sign the Oppose the New Zealand Government Food Bill 160-2.
Get informed, so you can tell people why they, too, should oppose this bill. These are websites and articles that can help:
Finally, New Zealand has just had parliamentary elections. Start sending letters and e-mails to your member of parliament. Tell them that Food Bill 160-2 is unacceptable, that it’s an abridgement of your rights. Let them know that treating food as a commodity is simply wrong. It’s nourishment—and its control needs to be removed from the hands of agribusiness multinational corporations.



http://foodsafety.govt.nz/policy-law/reform-nz-food-regulations/food-bill/


Sharing this page …
Thanks! Close

                 


             













     


New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/WSm5jnfA
1 month ago
@kyleipryor



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment « Gaia Health http://t.co/bOGV76rB
1 month ago
@Noicard



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment « Gaia Health http://t.co/yrH2fXs2
1 month ago
@xmbx



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/dluTiZu8
1 month ago
@ImKeenashe



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/0oJAddVK
1 month ago
@Versopoet



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/N26qNOvE
1 month ago
@silkmeadow



: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment « Gaia Health http://t.co/98ytMwIA
1 month ago
@Hermienda



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/wjfvRau4
1 month ago
@rickpursell



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate http://t.co/XUL6rZkf
1 month ago
@HumanDesignOz



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/C7zxCBA8
1 month ago
@doctorsensation


Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Search Gaia Health







Subscribe to the Gaia Health
Newsletter




Don't miss breaking Gaia Health articles.
Rest assured that your e-mail address will never be sold or shared.






Enhanced by Zemanta