Tuesday, January 10, 2012

US Congress wants dictatorial control over Internet...

Ask gaming company Electronic Arts to oppose the Internet censorship bill.
Sign the Petition
Breaking news:  Hello free world...

Congress has a plan to change the Internet forever. A bill they're debating right now would give the government power to shut down whole websites, and even let corporations say which websites should be shut down.
That means a huge corporation could have any website even suspected of violating a copyright shut down -- no questions asked. The government could then completely block all access to sites as big as Facebook or YouTube if one person posts one thing on those websites that corporations don't want online.
Most major entertainment companies have come out in support of the bill, but despite swirling rumors, the huge video-gaming company Electronic Arts (EA) has yet to take an official stance. However, EA is part of the Entertainment Software Association, one of the big corporate lobbyists for the bill to censor the Internet -- meaning that if EA came out against the bill, that would be a serious blow to the people trying to get it passed


Turkey internet ban protest 2011
Image via Wikipedia
http://myvikaroti.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/congress-has-a-plan-to-change-the-internet-forever/

http://by152w.bay152.mail.live.com/?n=1929130864&rru=inbox&fid=1&fav=1&mid=aef1fa2d-3c0f-11e1-bae5-00215ad9dfd2&fv=1#!/?rru=inbox

Read much more below:
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, January 08, 2012

Codex Alimentarius in New Zealand - the food police...

English: Template for Template:Food safety
Image via Wikipedia

Chemical Food Cosh, by amazing artist and homeopath Gina Tyler, http:ginatyler.com (with the words, "Chemical Food Cosh", added)
Chemical Food Cosh, by amazing artist and homeopath Gina Tyler, http:ginatyler.com (with the words, "Chemical Food Cosh", added)
In New Zealand, the goals of Codex Alimentarius are being implemented at a rate that can only make the technocrats of the US and EU envious. Proposed legislation—thus far sliding through the legislative process like a greased pig—will force controls on food production that can only favor multinational growers and threaten the existence of all small operations. It treats foods as a commodity and eliminates the presumption that people can grow and access their foods of choice.
Rather than being something we all understand and come to comprehend through the learning process that brings us to adulthood, food is redefined. According to the Food Safety Bill, food will no longer simply be “food”, it will become “food and food related products“. Food related products?
With the implementation of Food Bill 160-2, massive new powers, including powers of arrest, will be given to “food safety officers”, who can be members of the private sector. That means employees of Monsanto could be authorized to conduct raids. Worse, they will be given immunity from criminal and civil prosecution for any acts during those raids. Even marae, communal and sacred places, will be subject to their actions. Warrants will not be required so there will be no need for evidence of a crime, meaning anyone could be raided at any time…and there will be no recourse, no matter how egregious their acts.

Codex Alimentarius: The Reason for the Food Bill

The purpose of the bill—as stated by New Zealand Food Safety Authority—is to bring New Zealand into line with Codex Alimentarius provisions. It is the goal of Codex Alimentarius to bring the entire world under subjugation by multinational corporate agribusiness.
  • They will define what food is.
  • They will decide what we can and cannot eat.
  • They will determine what we can and cannot know.
  • They will control what we put in our bodies.
  • Their will cannot be opposed, because they will have absolute power—with no means to check them with either criminal or civil sanctions.
  • They will not even need the approval of courts: raids will not require a warrant.
They will enforce their control through whatever means they choose—and they will define their arena of control as they choose.
It’s being sold as needed for food safety—but the fact is that any need for such measures exists only because of modern factory farming and factory food production methods. Until their advent, food was simply food. We knew how to take care of it. We knew how to grow it. We knew what was healthy. Now, though, food has been redefined as conglomerations of chemicals, divorced from their original living sources.
And we will soon have no option but to accept it—unless you act now.

New Zealand’s Food Safety Authority

New Zealand Food Safety Authority
Images from New Zealand Food Safety Authority website
The images on the left were taken from the New Zealand Food Safety Authority website’s home page. They were interspersed with heartwarming food images, like one of a beekeeper, but they reveal exactly how they view food. To the authorities, food isn’t life-giving nutrition, a gift from nature. No, to them food is combinations of chemicals, put together in whatever fashion multinational corporations choose, sterilized and purified, denatured, fortified, and whatever chemicals they try to put into it because their processing has destroyed anything related to the life-giving gifts of Gaia.
New Zealand’s Food Safety Authority is already making arrangements to implement and promote the Food Bill, as if it were already in effect. Their website actively promotes Codex Alimentarius, saying that, “Codex plays a pivotal role in developing international standards for health protection and ensuring fair practices in food trade.” Notice the conjunction of health protection and fair practices? That’s no accident. Codex uses the excuse of health protection to cram “fair practices” for agribusiness down our throats.
Make no mistake about it: The purpose of Codex Alimentarius and its implementation by New Zealand and nearly every other country in the world has nothing to do with our health. It’s all about making the world safe for agribusiness—to give them complete control over what we eat, even to the point of defining what food is, so that nothing can stand in the way of making and increasing their profits. That’s why “food safety officers” will be immune from civil and criminal prosecution. They’ll be above the law, able to walk into your business—or simply claim that your home is a business and walk in—and take whatever they wish, damage whatever they wish, hold you at gunpoint, and arrest you. You will have no recourse.

Everyone Is Affected

The Food Bill will affect everyone. As NZ Food Security.org says:
  • It turns a human right (to grow food and share it) into a government-authorised privilege that can be summarily revoked.
  • It makes it illegal to distribute “food” without authorisation, and it defines “food” in such a way that it includes nutrients, seeds, natural medicines, essential minerals and drinks (including water).
  • By controlling seeds, the bill takes the power to grow food away from the public and puts it in the hands of seed companies. That power may be abused. [That power will be abused! --Editor]
  • The bill will push up mainstream food prices by subjecting producers to red tape and registration costs.
  • Growing food for distribution must be authorised, even for “cottage industries”, and such authorisation can be denied.
  • The Food Bill means that non-Codex-complying producers can be shut down easily – thus it paves the way for the legal enforcement of Codex food regulations. Producers will be denied registration (which is discretionary) if they do not keep to Codex food production rules.
The knock-on effects could include:
  • Loss of ability to be self-sufficient.
  • Potential loss of seed banks if they can’t gain authorization—and what’s the likelihood of Monsanto going along with that?
  • Bartering becoming difficult or illegal, just as the costs of buying food goes up because of added costs and fees.
  • Loss of heirloom seeds—an agricultural disaster.
  • Loss of organic food.
NZ Food Security provides a wealth of information on these issues. Please, take a look.

Can This Travesty Be Stopped?

The question is, will enough people see the danger and act? It’s up to you. A good start is to sign the Oppose the New Zealand Government Food Bill 160-2.
Get informed, so you can tell people why they, too, should oppose this bill. These are websites and articles that can help:
Finally, New Zealand has just had parliamentary elections. Start sending letters and e-mails to your member of parliament. Tell them that Food Bill 160-2 is unacceptable, that it’s an abridgement of your rights. Let them know that treating food as a commodity is simply wrong. It’s nourishment—and its control needs to be removed from the hands of agribusiness multinational corporations.



http://foodsafety.govt.nz/policy-law/reform-nz-food-regulations/food-bill/


Sharing this page …
Thanks! Close

                 


             













     


New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/WSm5jnfA
1 month ago
@kyleipryor



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment « Gaia Health http://t.co/bOGV76rB
1 month ago
@Noicard



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment « Gaia Health http://t.co/yrH2fXs2
1 month ago
@xmbx



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/dluTiZu8
1 month ago
@ImKeenashe



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/0oJAddVK
1 month ago
@Versopoet



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/N26qNOvE
1 month ago
@silkmeadow



: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment « Gaia Health http://t.co/98ytMwIA
1 month ago
@Hermienda



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/wjfvRau4
1 month ago
@rickpursell



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate http://t.co/XUL6rZkf
1 month ago
@HumanDesignOz



New Zealand Becomes Codex Alimentarius Incarnate: Food As Commodity, Not Nourishment | Gaia Health http://t.co/C7zxCBA8
1 month ago
@doctorsensation


Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Search Gaia Health







Subscribe to the Gaia Health
Newsletter




Don't miss breaking Gaia Health articles.
Rest assured that your e-mail address will never be sold or shared.






Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, January 02, 2012

The CIA and the Nazis - a full length documentary...

Seal of the C.I.A. - Central Intelligence Agen...
Image via Wikipedia
Conspiracy: 'The CIA and the Nazis' reveals a CIA program known as Operation Paperclip, about how 4000 former Nazis worked with the US Government without public knowledge over many decades to fight the Soviet Union. You can draw your own conclusions. Was it a huge confidence trick? Probably not, but the US Government was ripped off to the extent that 90% of the intel they received was undoubtably flawed, inaccurate and not worth the paper it was written on. But the fact 10% of the intel was accurate, was probably enough to deal to the Dark Empire.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKlQGKg1sa4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoMR_Oj6Qrs&feature=fvwrel   The Aldebaran Mystery
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, December 30, 2011

Assad and his Syrian regime are disgusting butchers - a gold pistol for Assad

Assad (Syria)
Image by sipazigaltumu via Flickr
Coat of arms of Syria -- the "Hawk of Qur...
Image via Wikipedia
English: Brasilia - The president of the Syria...
Image via Wikipedia

Demonstrators protesting against al-Assad in Kafranbel earlier this month
Demonstrators protesting against al-Assad in Kafranbel earlier this month Photograph: Handout/REUTERS
Between bursts of machine-gun fire and the crump of explosions – unmuffled in crisp mountain air – the starry sky above the Syrian frontier offers ethereal distraction. It's 3am and the town of Tal Kalakh, less than two miles to the north – just inside the Syrian Arab Republic – is under sustained attack, its residents reportedly refusing to hand over a small band of defectors who have holed up there, trying to bolt for Lebanon to join the insurgents.
All around are mountains among which ancient armies have battled for millennia. And below, in besieged Tal Kalakh, a western outpost in the restive governorate of Homs, the Syrian army is once again hard at work, killing its own people. Tal Kalakh has felt the full force of violent repression many times since the Syrian revolt erupted back in March. One day, Tal Kalakh will doubtless appear on the revolutionary roll of honour. For now, this town of 80,000 people doesn't even merit a mention in my guidebook.
"We don't kill our people," President Bashar al-Assad said last week in an American television interview. "No government in the world kills its people unless it's led by a crazy person." Those who dare oppose al-Assad do not think their leader crazy. Crazed, maybe. But today they see straight through him. They're tired of the lies. They have seen too much.
Between late November and early December, I was one of just two foreign reporters granted an official journalist visa to this repressive police state. I spent nine days in Damascus, capital of al-Assad's Republic of Fear, as a guest of the government. There, I encountered an angrily defiant regime, robust and resolute and unapologetic. Earlier in this Arab spring, I spent six weeks in Libya. There are echoes of Gaddafi in the personality cult surrounding al-Assad, but Syria's political and security apparatus is bigger and badder than anything Gaddafi could muster. I do not mean to belittle the suffering of Libyans, but Syria has four times the Libyan population and 10 times the menace.



Over the course of those nine days, I interviewed three government ministers, an army general and the mayor of a rebellious city. I heard nothing but denials that the security forces were shooting, shelling and torturing civilians. The government blames "armed gangs" and "terrorists" and invokes the spectre of Islamist insurgents, just as Gaddafi's henchmen did. And like them, they see western-backed conspiracies. They talk of a media war in which Arab and western satellite TV stations broadcast "lies" and "fabricated videos."
"Do you really think that we would accept torture?" I was asked by a seemingly incredulous Bouthaina Shaaban – presidential adviser and senior government minister – when I challenged her on the persistent allegations, most recently documented in great detail by the UN Human Rights Council's Independent Commission of Inquiry. "Syria has no policy of torture whatsoever," she said. "We do not have Guantánamo or Abu Ghraib. That is absolutely unacceptable by us. Absolutely unacceptable." Every government minister complained of the outside world's anti-Syrian agenda, which overlooked the barbarous excesses of "armed gangs" that, they claimed, had tortured, killed and often dismembered 1,400 Syrian soldiers.
Syria is party to the 1984 UN Convention Against Torture. This convention defines "torture" as any act which intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering, physical or mental, with the intention of obtaining information, a confession or punishing an individual for something he or someone else has committed or is suspected of committing.
"It's rampant," says Nadim Houry, the Beirut-based deputy director of Human Rights Watch for the Middle East and North Africa, who has taken testimony on hundreds of cases of torture from Syria, "and, the odds are, if you're detained, you will be ill treated and most likely tortured. We know of at least 105 cases of people who were returned from the custody of security services in body bags to their loved ones … and those are only the ones that we know of." Mr Houry says he has evidence that tens of thousands of Syrians have been arbitrarily detained over the months.
"But we have also documented what I would call "meaningless torture" – if there is ever such a thing. They've got all the information but they want to teach you a lesson. I think that lesson is "you need to fear us". And the striking thing that I've seen is that despite that torture, people are no longer afraid. The wall of fear has been broken."
A short drive from the frontier, along hair-pinned mountain roads, past Lebanese checkpoints where friendly soldiers shiver, is a Syrian safe-house. There is no electricity. The place is crammed with refugees; there are children sleeping everywhere. In an upstairs room, next to a small wood-burner, a weathered former tractor driver from Tal Kalakh – who is in his 50s – winces as pains shoot through his battered body, lying on a mattress on the concrete floor. He manoeuvres himself on to a pile of pillows and lights a cigarette. He's relieved to have escaped to Lebanon but he's already yearning to go home. He can't though. His right leg is now gangrenous below the knee; he can barely move. So far he's had only basic medical treatment.
Before sunrise one morning, he told me, as troops laid siege to his town, he'd been shot twice by "shabiha", pro-al-Assad militia. Unable to run, he had been rounded up, thrashed and driven down the road to nearby Homs with many other detainees, being beaten all the way. For the next few weeks, his bullet wounds were left to fester, he says, while he was subjected to torture so extreme that his accounts of what had happened to him left those of us who listened stunned and feeling sick. During his time in detention, he had been passed, he claimed, to five different branches of al-Assad's sadistic secret police, the Mukhabarat.
In flickering candle-light, he told me in gruesome detail of beatings he'd received with batons and electric cables on the soles of his feet (a technique called "falaka"). He had been hung by his knees, immobilised inside a twisting rubber tyre, itself suspended from the ceiling. He had been shackled hand and foot and hung upside down for hours – the Mukhabarat's notorious "flying carpet". Then hung up by his wrists ("the ghost"), and whipped and tormented with electric cattle prods.
When he wasn't being tortured, he had been crammed into cells with up to 80 people, without room to sit or sleep, he claimed. They stood hungry, naked and frightened in darkness, in their filth, unfed, unwashed. He recalled the stench and listening to the screams of others echoing through their sordid dungeon. He told of being thrown rotting food. And of the sobbing of the children.
"I saw at least 200 children – some as young as 10," he said. "And there were old men in their 80s. I watched one having his teeth pulled out by pliers." In Syria's torture chambers, age is of no consequence, it seems. But for civilians who have risen up against al-Assad, it has been the torture – and death in custody – of children that has caused particular revulsion.
The tractor driver told of regular interrogations, of forced confessions (for crimes he never knew he had committed); he spoke of knives and other people's severed fingers, of pliers and ropes and wires, of boiling water, cigarette burns and finger nails extracted – and worse: electric drills. There had been sexual abuse, he said, but that was all he said of that.
Having finished in one place, he'd been transferred to yet another branch of the Mukhabarat and his nightmare would start all over again. And as the beatings went on day in, day out, his legs and the soles of his feet became raw and infected. That was when they forced him to "walk on rocks of salt". He told me, speaking clearly, slowly: "When you are bleeding and the salt comes into your flesh, it hurts a lot more than the beating. I was forced to walk round and round to feel more pain."
He lit another cigarette, then said: "Although we are suffering from torture, we are not afraid any more. There is no fear. We used to fear the regime, but there is no place for fear now." If the intention of torture is to terrorise, it has in recent months had the opposite effect. Each act of brutality has served, it seems, to reinforce the growing sense of outrage and injustice and has triggered ever more widespread insurrection.
I met other survivors in other safe houses and each account corroborated the other. A pharmacist, abducted by militia from a hospital to which he'd been taken after being shot. His experience of torture was every bit as bad as that of the tractor driver. The 16-year-old boy, beaten, electrocuted to the point he thought he would die, then threatened with execution. He was now having trouble sleeping.
Another man, placed in what he called "the electric coffin" – in which a detainee is forced to lie inside a wooden box, across two metal plates through which they pass a current. The 73-year-old man was mercilessly whipped, electrocuted and beaten because of his son's known opposition activities abroad. He talked of hundreds of detainees pushed into cells, humiliated and naked. Another torture refugee told of a device they called "the German chair", so named, apparently, because it was devised by the Stasi. In it, a detainee is bent backwards until he feels his spine will snap.
What emerged was a pattern of systematic brutality, a revolving door of terror through which thousands of people have passed in recent months. This is Syria's torture machine. It is torture on an industrial scale.
While in Syria, we lived in a bubble, seeing nothing of the extreme brutality and killing for which the Syrian regime is so notorious. We were taken to mass rallies, where thousands of frenzied supporters kissed portraits of al-Assad for our cameras and chanted slogans in defiance of Arab League sanctions.
For two days we were not granted filming permits – and it's probably no coincidence that one of those days was a Friday, the day on which hundreds of anti-government demonstrations are guaranteed to break out right across the country after midday prayers. One day, while we were legally filming on a street, our government minder – despite wielding official documents embossed with Ministry of Information double-headed eagles – was arrested by angry Mukhabarat agents. We never found out why this particular location was so sensitive. Our minder returned, visibly shaken, 15 minutes later. "We cannot film here," he said. "Let's go."
Despite daily requests, we were refused access to cities such as Homs and Hama whose residents were posting videos on YouTube showing tanks firing at random into civilian areas. When we were finally taken to Dara'a, the southern city that had been the cradle of this insurrection, we travelled in the presence of four government minders and, when we attempted to talk to anyone, we found ourselves surrounded by Mukhabarat who instructed our interviewees to tell us everything was normal. It was very claustrophobic.
Despite this, an astonishing number of Syrian people did approach us, subtly – and often quaking – to tell us that all was not as it appeared, that they detested the regime and that there were thousands out there like them. One man touched my arm as I stood in the midst of a mass rally in downtown Damascus, completely surrounded by the ranting and raging regime-faithful. As I looked round, he caught my eye and simply uttered the word "Bashar" as he drew his index finger across his throat, before melting into the loyalist crowd. If he'd been spotted he might as well have signed his own death warrant.
A road snakes up the barren rock of Mount Qasioun which overlooks Damascus and on a clear day, from 1,000m up, there's a magnificent panoramic view across the capital. From this vantage point, if you know what you're looking for, it is possible to pick out at least seven locations where you can say with a good degree of certainty that people are being tortured at any single moment. The thought spoils the view.
Each of the four main pillars of the Mukhabarat – military intelligence, air force intelligence, the political security directorate and the general security directorate – has its headquarters in the city. And each has sub-branches: general security has three – including the feared Palestine branch – and military intelligence has several, among them the notorious Branch 235. No one seems to know what the number means. Each of these agencies is an empire inside an empire, with bureaux the length and breadth of Syria. Since the revolt started, detention facilities have not been confined to known intelligence buildings; the Mukhabarat have used stadiums and football fields in several cities to detain and torture suspects. In smaller towns and villages, market squares suffice. The four main intelligence agencies are thought to be directly under the control of the president.
While al-Assad increasingly faces armed insurrection from those weary of life in his Big Brother world, the most potent weapon in opposition hands is the mobile phone. Grainy footage of violent acts of repression – and of those tortured and killed by the regime – has been uploaded and rebroadcast to a global audience of millions.
These videos make distressing viewing. In one, a mother is seen weeping over the body of her 27-year-old son who has been delivered home, dead, after a week in detention. He has marks and bruises all over his body and there is a bullet wound. "May Allah take revenge against all tyrants," the woman wails. "On each and every unjust person, Bashar and his aides, my God, may You take revenge on him."
Such footage has caused irreparable damage to al-Assad's regime. But the government ministers I spoke to about these videos roundly dismiss them as faked or filmed somewhere else at another time. If verified, however, such footage would present important evidence of the crimes the regime now stands accused of by the UN Human Rights Council Inquiry. The sheer volume of such material – upwards of 30,000 videos have now been posted on the internet by Syrian opposition activists – spurred Channel 4 to commission a documentary investigation.
We employed a team of experts to forensically examine video footage, subjecting it to a strict verification protocol. We have independently checked, when possible, the sources of the material, looked for time-specific clues, then examined location details with Syrians from those places. Specific incidents have been cross-checked and corroborated by independent sources. Exiled former members of the Syrian security forces have checked vehicles, uniforms and military insignia. A growing number of these videos show soldiers actually committing acts of torture, openly filming each other. It's chilling: not one of them appears to be worried about being identified.
Accents have been carefully listened to. And the records of those uploading video have been examined for consistency and reliability. We sought the advice of a specialist doctor from the charity Freedom from Torture. We employed a forensic pathologist, Professor Derrick Pounder, to examine grim video evidence of those whose relatives allege were killed under torture.
The result is a grotesque compendium of verified video material which we believe to present irrefutable prima facie evidence of crimes against humanity.
Talking me through this material, Pounder said the videos show "compelling evidence of crude physical violence, strangulation, homicide, shootings and general assaults. There is a very distinctive pattern of … physical violence in an extreme form," he said. "It would suggest that what was happening was happening on a wide scale and it would suggest that what was happening was carried out with impunity … There is no consequence for them even if there is clear evidence of an assault." So much for the UN Convention Against Torture.
One evening, when I was interviewing torture victims in a Syrian safe house in Lebanon, there was a great commotion. A Syrian army defector, who had commanded resistance in the district of Baba Amr in Homs – the city Syrians have dubbed "Capital of the Revolution" – was being carried into the safe-house by four men. He had been shot nine times and had somehow survived, but he was in terrible pain. He had recently been smuggled into Lebanon from Tal Kalakh.
The next morning, he was well enough to talk briefly. It was my first encounter with a former member of the Syrian security forces. He told me that mass detention and severe torture were commonplace. "When the army carries out a detention campaign," he said, "they start to torture the detainee until the security services arrive. They then take him to the military security branch, which is like a human slaughter house. Most of the people taken there alive are discharged dead."
While a platoon commander in the army he had accompanied officers in house-to-house searches for wanted men in Homs, he said. "When they don't find their target, they either rape the women, or kill the children." He named the officers in charge and his commanding officer. They were all Allawites, he said – members of the prominent Syrian Shia sect to which the president belongs. When they had failed to find one man on their wanted list, he claimed, they had taken his son, beheaded him and hung his head above the door of the family home. He related this account in a faltering manner as though struggling to find the words, and as he did so, tears rolled down his face. But he was so badly wounded, he couldn't wipe the tears away. This, he told me, was what had prompted his defection.
I told him that the UN had just raised its estimated death count to 4,000 civilians killed since March. (This week they raised that to 5,000.) He looked at me in disbelief. He said the number was much higher. After four decades of al-Assad rule, one man is held accountable for this bloody-thirsty repression: the army's commander-in-chief and the head of Syrian Intelligence – the president of the republic himself. And if al-Assad was to attempt to stop all this, could he, I asked Nadim Houry. "I don't know the answer to that," he said. "But I do know that he never tried to stop it."
Syria's Torture Machine, 19 December, 11.10pm, Channel 4. To watch the programme and for more information visit: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/syrias-torture-machine

http://www.immortaltechnique.co.uk/Thread-Panorama-Syria-Inside-the-secret-revolution
Enhanced by Zemanta