Image via Wikipedia
The Untold Story Of The Balibo Five
The depressing saga of Australian efforts to establish the fate of the five Australia-based TV reporters killed in Balibo illustrates the bind that Australian diplomats had created for themselves.
They knew Indonesian forces carried out the attack on Balibo and had been warned by Harry Tjan, the director of the quasi-academic think tank that was their key source of information on Indonesia's intentions towards Portuguese Timor. But they wouldn't say so publicly, for fear of cutting off their source and jeopardising relations with Jakarta.
Death Of "Balibo Five" Was Premeditated War Crime 20/11/2007
Troops Covered Up Murder Of 'Balibo Five' 16/02/2007
Report by Inspector General into the Balibo Five 04/06/2002
Blick report into Balibo five 04/06/2002
Results powered by search.scoop.co.nz More Related Stories >>>
On October 13, 1975, Tjan told the Australian embassy in Jakarta that Indonesian forces were finally about to enter the territory.
The main thrust would begin on October 15, through Balibo and Maliana/Atsabe. President Suharto had insisted "no Indonesian flag" be used, giving Jakarta the cloak of deniability.
Portuguese Timor's ordeal was about to enter a new and terrible phase. The five journalists had little more than two days to live.
In Canberra on October 15, Timor dominated Prime Minister Gough Whitlam's discussions with visiting Malaysian Prime Minister Abdul Razak. Whitlam complained of biased Australian media reporting. The trouble was the reporters had easy access to Dili and Baucau, he said, but didn't go to the border areas, so they gave a one-sided picture. The five reporters, now in Balibo on the border, had only hours to live.
On the morning of October 16, Indonesian troops disguised as Timorese anti-Fretilin forces attacked Balibo. The five reporters were killed.
In the documents released yesterday, the first reference to the journalists' fate is a transcript of an ABC news item on October 17, reporting the journalists were missing. The transcript was sent to the embassy in Jakarta, requesting urgent inquiries. So began extraordinary efforts by Australian diplomats to establish what happened to the journalists, which at times bordered on farcical charade.
As well as not wanting to jeopardise their Indonesian sources, the diplomats wouldn't compromise more secret sources. It is known Australian intelligence agencies that intercepted Indonesian radio traffic were aware of the deaths on October 16, and that the Federal Government was informed that night. All references to intelligence material have been expunged from the documents.
On October 17, when Gerald Stone of Channel Nine rang the embassy asking
if it had more information on the journalists, he was told nothing more was available.
The Indonesian Foreign Ministry and Tjan both told the embassy that any information on Balibo would have to come from anti-Fretilin forces, in line with the fiction that Jakarta was not involved in the Balibo operation. "We said we understood this completely," the embassy said in a cable on October 17.
The following day ambassador Richard Woolcott cabled Canberra: "As you will know (half a line of intelligence material is expunged) it now appears likely that at least four and possible all five of the Australian journalists were killed in the fighting in and around Balibo."
If true, this was a "sad and dreadful development".
The cable made no other reference to remorse for the journalists or their families. Rather, Woolcott was concerned about the risk of "serious consequences" if Australian public opinion was inflamed "if it appears that Australian casualties are the result of Indonesian intervention".
The cable went on to shift blame for the reporters' fate, pointing the finger at Canberra's responsibility to alert Australians to the dangers of the border area.
Woolcott's cable prompted a stinging response from Foreign Affairs head Alan Renouf, who replied personally, complaining about the "tone and language", which was "quite inappropriate and is resented here".
On October 19, Woolcott had a frosty encounter with Indonesian Foreign Minister Adam Malik, who was angry and dismissive. Any information on the journalists would have to come from anti-Fretilin forces, not Indonesia,
and he raised the question of whether the journalists had worn Fretilin uniforms.
In the following weeks, Australian diplomats engaged in a fruitless and humiliating series of representations with Jakarta officials, seeking some confirmation on the fate of the journalists that could satisfy distraught families and an increasing alarmed Australian public.
On October 20, Tjan told the embassy that four bodies had been found at Balibo. The embassy passed on the information to Canberra but, because of the source, warned it should not be used in any public statements.
Daily the embassy contacted the Indonesian Foreign Ministry, which daily held out hopes for information. "Each day we are disappointed," the embassy reported on October 23.
The embassy suspected information on the "missing" journalists could be produced at the "drop of a hat", but said "influential elements", apparently the BAKIN intelligence agency, "are clearly preventing us from receiving it".
Eleven days after the reporters' deaths, a BAKIN officer told the embassy they were dead, but this could not be publicly released as it would imply Indonesian involvement in the Balibo attack.
Final confirmation of their deaths, if not how they died, came on November 12, when Woolcott met Lieutenant-General Yoga Sugama, head of BAKIN, who handed over four boxes of remains. The embassy doctor "confirmed to the best of his knowledge they were human remains".
+++niuswire
PACIFIC MEDIA WATCH ONLINE: http://www.pmw.c2o.org
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=71be8e0b-264b-4077-bd0f-1064645863c4)
2 comments:
Hi Peter,
There were several versions on what has happened in Balibo 1975.
The question is why did the Aussie authorities initiate investigation on this case only a few years ago? two decades after the tragedy.
Why didn't the investigate soon after they find out about the death of the 5 reporters? when all the persons involved plus evidence are still readily available.
If I am not wrong the Aussie Police started its investigation around 2-3 years ago. Please correct me if I am wrong.
There is a strong smell of politics permeating this whole controversy. Why didn't the then Australian PM, Gough Whitlam, demand some facts. I believe Australia did not want to upset the Suharto Government at that time. And my NZ government has taken a very non-New Zealand type role in the whole saga. NZ normally asks the right questions?
We both know there is a world of difference between the political situation that existed then and what it is now.
During those days Indonesia was effectively expanding its territories in the area, and claimed East Timor as its territory after colonialism had finished. But the people in the area have demanded and finally obtained through much bloodshed, independence.
I'm not going to insult your country or you personally by becoming all emotional about what happened - I would like to know exactly what happened at Balibo. One of the five, and later six, journalists was a Kiwi the cameraman. A couple were Aussies and two others were Brits.
I don't know why there has been such a delay in getting to the facts - the truth? I don't know. I will post another short story about Balibo from a New Zealand perspective. This is difficult considering the NZ Government has just acted dumb about the whole business.
So I have added links to a number of stories and people can wade through things and try and make up their own minds.
Regards,
Peter
Post a Comment