Image via Wikipedia

A most despicable decision by Sidetick to rob me of potential earnings and disable my account...




What do you know about Sidetick, a recent addition to the list of social network sites on the internet? Sidetick claimed last year, 2009, that they wanted to become the top site of its type out there. After you read this post you may have second thoughts!



I was introduced to the site by a good blogging friend and became quite rapt with Sidetick. Everything you did on site, visiting friends participating in polls, writing and replying to blog posts, playing games, adding music, photos, videos etc. I also participated regularly in last season's American Football Pools. using my memory really, as a New Zealander with limited knowledge of the game and the teams, I was earning from 3500 Points or Sidetick dollars up to 5000 a week. Hey, my points began to mount up.



Sidetick promised a payout to EVERYBODY at Sidetick when they had amassed 200,000 SD or US$100.00. On Feb 23 this year I noticed I had earned 89,000SD. The following day a bombshell was released! But for some reason I didn't pick it up until Feb27, my birthday. Do you know what it was? Well let me tell you dear reader!



Sidetick announced that only Americans and and some friends from Canada, United kingdom, Australia and Israel would continue to be allowed to earn money at Sidetick.I was shocked because as a New Zealander, across the Tasman Sea from our cousins in Australia was now a declared foreigner. As foreign as a North Korean! I was disgusted and deeply hurt by the despicable decision and ban against me. I sent some strong messages and wrote a couple of blog posts at Sidetick expressing my opinion. I have never been called a foreigner by Americans - usually friends and allies. We have special forces troops laying it on the line in Afghanistan. Tell our SAS troopers they are a bunch of foreigners!



So the upshot of Sideticks decision - treating those thousands of foreign members who have been supporting Sidetick very poorly indeed. They messaged us telling us they would investigate ways for foreign members to continue earning Sidetick dollars which could be cashed out in time. Well I've only earned what in reality will be pennies. I would never be in a position to ever cash my 89000SD into cash.



Its actually false pretences back home here in NZ. They have actually illegally changed their rules. I haven' t bothered to participate in Sidetick since. I have written and sent a Letter to the Editor of a Georgia newspaper. Sidetick are based in Atlanta.



Well, what do you think of that decision readers? Sidetick will never become a leading soaial network site because they don't understand the word "social".



Since I wrote this they have disabled my account and basically robbed me of potentially about US$45.000. I will continue to tell the world about their despicable treatment of me and other "foreigners".



Don't have a bar of these so-called social networkers - they will rob you blind. No? What do you think they have just done to me? If you see the word Sidetick start running!

Related articles by Zemanta

• Yahoo pulls Facebook into Yahoo Mail (macworld.com)
• Official contacts are closer than you may think (sluggerotoole.com)
• We All Need A Little Love (fakeplasticsouks.blogspot.com)
• Company Outputs Vs Customer Expectations in Social CRM (cloudave.com)
• Air New Zealand - Continental Airlines Code Share an added Tourism Boost (eon.businesswire.com)
• Rugby World Cup is too expensive for New Zealand, says minister (guardian.co.uk)
• Company Outputs vs Customer Expectations in Social CRM (socialmediatoday.com)

Image via Wikipedia

And they were really neighbours... 
Two Canadian brothers separated at a young age, both searching for their biological family have discovered they live across the road from each other.



Tommy Larkin, 30, and Stephen Goosney, 29, were given away to different adoptive families as infants and were left with little personal information to track down their birth parents.



Both brothers were searching for their biological families in order to find out their medical history before discovering they were neighbours, the Canadian Press reported.



Mr Larkin was at his Newfoundland home when he was told over the phone his biological brother's address — the house directly across the road from his.



Mr Larkin waited until his brother returned to the house the next day, then gave him a call.



"It was all pretty overwhelming," Mr Goosney said.



"We have been seeing each other pretty much every day, just hanging out and trying to catch up."



Mr Goosney said the pair felt an immediate connection after meeting.



"It feels different, having someone I can call a brother," he said.



"We both have families, but this is as close as it gets."



The brothers are now looking for the rest of their biological family.



Acknowledgements: MSN NZ News

Related articles by Zemanta

• Adopted brothers find each other - across the street (canada.com)
• Adopted siblings find each other living across the street (thestar.com)
• U.S.-based Tempur buys its Canadian distributor (financialpost.com)
• UFC says event in Vancouver will take place (cbc.ca)
• Pamela Anderson requests info on seal hunt spending (cbc.ca)

Image via Wikipedia

Glasses aren't so geeky after all - they could be sexy...



Glasses aren’t so geeky after all - could be sexy? Well I wear them and have for a number of years now. Am I sexy? Well thats in the eyes of the beholder. So perhaps we may hear and see less of those extremely unkind and sometimes cutting comments about people who were glasses. We may be sexy?



Investing your hard-earned cash in a pair of spectacles is something no person should be ashamed of. In fact, turning a little four-eyed could be the first step to a new, and better, you.



According to the results of a recent survey commissioned by OPSM, wearing glasses improves your employment, sex and fashion appeal.



The online survey of 482 Kiwis by Stellar Market Research found a whopping 74 percent believe that glasses can make people look sexy and 93 percent believe glasses are more stylish than they used to be.



It's definitely time to bin the contact lenses.



More than one in four of those surveyed would consider wearing frames as a fashion accessory, even if they didn't need a prescription. And more than three quarters of people admitted to checking out a potential partner purely because of their eyewear.



Employability is also boosted by a pair of rims. Almost two thirds of people believe wearing glasses helps improve employment chances, while more than half think wearing glasses helps to make a better impression at a job interview and makes a positive first impression in the workplace



Acknowledgements: MSN-Fashion

Related articles by Zemanta

• The Evolution Of Sunglasses Being A Note Of Fashion (recycleemail.com)
• The Interesting History Of Sun Glasses Being Symbol Of Mode (recycleemail.com)
• Contacts before LASIK (realself.com)
• Are glasses better for the planet than contact lenses? (slate.com)
• Eye Moisturizers -- Contacts Lens For Dry Eyes (newmediamedicine.com)
• Seeing Multifocal (online.wsj.com)
• GlassesUSA.com Adds Designer Yoshi Ayaka Eyeglasses to Catalog (prweb.com)
• In remembrance of Mrs. J, Toronto's eyewear maven (thestar.com)
• Why wait for Lasik? (realself.com)
• Wearing Glasses After Rhinoplasty (realself.com)
• Choosing new glasses is all about instinct (upyourego.com)

$8 prescription eyeglasses online - Sponsored Post

$8 prescription eyeglasses online - www.zennioptical.com

Great eyeglasses for $8 - see these top quality specs for yourself!

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

My Life - Sponsored Post

My Life - cpapixel.dedicatednetworks.com

Some old high school friends looking for you.

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

Psycho Rocket - Sponsored Post

Psycho Rocket - a.gmtrack.com

Psycho Rocket is the way for you to go!

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

DoGood Headquarters - Sponsored Post

DoGood Headquarters - dogoodhq.com

DoGood HQ has developed a free browse plug-in called the DoGood which I'm sure you will enjoy!

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

SkillAddiction - Sponsored Post

SkillAddiction - www.skilladdiction.com

SkillAddictionis a leading online skill gaming community from 150 countries... and you!

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

Elance - Sponsored Post

Elance - rubiqube.com

Elance - finding freelancers around the globe - immediate and cost effective. Hey! Thats cool!

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

CleanWear - Sponsored Post

CleanWear - www.clean-wear.com

CleanWear introduces a bold and cool clothing label - just for you- urban street, strange and humorous

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

Image via Wikipedia

Will Australai and New Zealand amalgamate, is it inevitable...



Australia and NZ merger 'inevitable'? Perhaps, but such a discussion would not be an isolated one; it would be be part of a wider discussion on republicanism.




Part One:  Polls and opinion







Some 40 per cent of Kiwis supported a debate about New Zealand becoming a state of Australia. Photo / Steven McNicholFormer Commonwealth Secretary-General Don McKinnon believes a merger with Australia is inevitable.



A recent poll has found 40 per cent of New Zealanders support a debate about becoming a state of Australia.



The UMR Research poll surveyed a thousand people on both sides of the Tasman.



Approximately a quarter of Kiwis favoured the country becoming part of the Australia with 71% opposed to the idea.



37% of Australian respondents supported the merger, compared 52% against it.



Sir Don - who is also a former Foreign Affairs Minister and chair of the Trans-Tasman Business Circle - told TVNZ's Q&A programme that it was just a matter of time before a formal agreement is reached with Australia.



"We've got nearly half a million New Zealanders living in Australia anyway," he said.



"By the time the next generation comes around, technology and the movement of people everywhere, New Zealanders won't want to be in the situation of paying taxes in both countries and all the time going through immigration and Customs.





They'll want to try to eliminate all those things."



Sir Don believes the shift will be people-driven, rather then politically motivated.



"It's a debate that's going to go on, but no political leader in New Zealand is going to win an election advocating this issue."



But Labour party leader Phil Goff said there was no reason for a union with Australia.



He said although Australia had nothing to lose from it, joining with a much larger country would mean giving up our national identity.



"New Zealanders are proud of their culture, they are proud of their history, they are proud of their sense of identity."



He said working towards a single economic market between the countries could be achieved without a merger.



"When we can get the benefits of a closer economic relationship and a single economic market, what are the additional benefits of simply being the seventh state?



"It's about making decisions in New Zealand for New Zealanders by New Zealanders that really matter. We can have a closer relationship, we can get the best of both worlds. Submerging ourselves into Australia is not required to achieve that."



Former Prime Minister Mike Moore said New Zealand simply had to "toughen up".



"We will not solve our economic problems by becoming a state or two states of Australia."




Part Two:  The Kiwi Riverman's opinion:



The above report is an interesting one. But as I said from the commencement of this post, such a discussion would be part of a wider discussion on the merits of republicanism. Australia will drive this discussion, and New Zealand would have to consider whether it could continue on on its own. When, not if,  New Zealand as a society decides its future, the discussion will move to one of a merger with Australia.

 It wouldn't be a simple merger as another state of Australia, but how New Zealand would fit in with a future expanding Australia. There could well be two states, or even three when considering Auckland's role. Auckland is becoming a "city state" with a quarter of New Zealand's population. The South Island is slowly becoming a different entity to the North Island. And its true that over a half a million New Zealanders already reside in Australia.

We should consider the origination of the Commonwealth of Australia: It was originally conceived as a "Commonwealth of Australasia", but the then Premier of New Zealand, Richard Seddon, pulled NZ out of the colony  amalgamation discussions and our country went on to become a dominion on its own. Australia became the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901, and New Zealand  became a dominion a few years later. But of course neither country really becoame fully self-governing for a few years after that.

And the matter of a republic? There will be a bit more water flowing under the bridge yet; New Zealand is actually in the process of discussing the merits of a new flag, but this is actually premature when considering the possibility of an amalgamation of the two countries, and of course the republic matter itself.

 New Zealand would have to consider the future of a number of pacific islands first: the Cooks Islands are  technically part of New Zealand, Niue and  Tokelau are territories and Samoa is getting closer to NZ every year as more and more Samoans become  resident in the country. So there is more to consider than a straight amalgamation with Australia. There could well be a consideration for an Oceanic republic.


Acknowledgements:  Newstalk ZB, NZ Herald, Peter Petterson.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Rugby World Cup is too expensive for New Zealand, says minister (guardian.co.uk)
• Chart: Video Clips of Pavement's Reunion (artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com)
• Australia wins fifth gold medal at track cycling world championships (sports.espn.go.com)
• New Zealand Economic Outlook Improves (seekingalpha.com)
• 3 reviews of New Zealand (rateitall.com)
• Prince William embarks on first official tour - a four-day visit to New Zealand (guardian.co.uk)
• Realising secularism (openparachute.wordpress.com)
• Air New Zealand to Transform its Tasman and Pacific Island Services (eon.businesswire.com)
• New Zealand Economy Expands (online.wsj.com)
• Australian and New Zealand police launch operation against binge drinking (telegraph.co.uk)

Multi-Channel Marketing - Sponsored Post

Multi-Channel Marketing - www.simplycast.com

SimplyCast the interactive platform just for you to grow your business.

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

Image via Wikipedia

New Zealand starvation case raises ethicacy issues - your opinion readers.




Phillipa Malpas, Auck Univ, says care home staff face ethical dilemma with Margaret Page's decision to starve herself to death



The actions of medical staff at Wellington's St John of God Hospital in allowing a woman to starve herself to death, are raising questions of medical ethicacy.



Margaret Page is disabled and terminally ill after suffering a cerebral haemorrhage 20 years ago. She has been living at the St John of God care home since 2006 and has not eaten for 11 days and has drunk only a small amount of water, because she no longer wants to live. Her separated husband has urged staff to force feed her, but the care home says it is her right to decide her fate. Three psychiatric assessments have found the 60-year-old is capable of making her own decisions.



Dr Malpas says it is a difficult situation.



"One of the principles that would come to mind would be the principle of do no harm and I guess you could ask the question, well, is it harmful in this situation to force her to eat? Is it harmful to allow her to do this?"



However, Dr Malpas says the law is very clear.



"Nobody who is competent can be forced to eat and drink or accept any medical treatment that they don't want even if that will end up hastening their death."



Dr Malpas says a competent person who forces another to eat or drink could be prosecuted for criminal assault, however an argument could be made that failing to force feed Mrs Page is assisting her suicide.



Ms Malpas says the ethical dilemma for staff in such situations is secondary to their obligations to the patient's will.



But aren't health professionals bound to take all care to ensure she is kept in the best of health? Do doctors till swear a hippocratical oath to do EVERYTHING in their power to ensure the woman's health?



Acknowledgements:

© 2010 NZCity, NewsTalkZB

Related articles by Zemanta

• Death with Dignity: one year later (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Dutch plan to let healthy elderly people commit suicide (teabreak.pk)
• Scott Mendelson, M.D.: It Is Time to Grant the Right to Die (huffingtonpost.com)
• Barbara Coombs Lee: An all-too-common tragedy and a small triumph. (huffingtonpost.com)
• The Cost of Dying (fdtate.blogspot.com)
• Mayo Clinic Researchers Find Younger, More Diverse Patients Having Total Knee Replacements (eon.businesswire.com)
• Home palliative sedation checklist may ease concerns (scienceblog.com)

MyDomain Brand .ME Contest - Sponsored Post

MyDomain Brand .ME Contest - www.mydomain.com

What a fantastic chance to win $1000 Apple gift cards, ME Domains and Web hosting from tlt consulting. Great!

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

Image via Wikipedia

Is this how the Brits treat their staff - by a Facebook message...


A 16-year-old UK girl who lost $21 while on an errand found out she lost her job when her manager posted a message on her Facebook page.



Chelsea Taylor was sacked from her Saturday job at a cafe via a heavily misspelt Facebook message, the Daily Mail reported.



Chelsea had been given $21 to go out and buy biscuits for the staff of Cookies, a cafe in Leigh in northern England.



When she lost the money she was notified of her dismissal with a Facebook message from manager Elaine Sutton.



"I had to tell the owner bout u losin that tenner coz obviously the till was down at the end of the day," the message read.



"she wasn't very pleased at all and despite me trying to persuade her otherwise she said I have to let u go."



Chelsea's mother Nicola said the Facebook dismissal was "appalling and heartless".



"I just can't believe they didn't even have the decency to tell her over the phone, let alone in person," she said.



"And to have the message all misspelt with capital letters and apostrophes missing is simply disrespectful and sets no example to other employees."



When Ms Taylor told Ms Sutton she lost the money she offered to replace it but the offer was declined.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Schoolgirl sacked from cafe job on Facebook (telegraph.co.uk)
• Facebook Considers Suing Daily Mail UK Over Slanderous Article (allfacebook.com)
• Facebook Threatens to Sue Daily Mail Over Sex Predator Claims (mashable.com)
• Hundreds vow to finish Chelsea King's SoCal run (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Facebook threatens to sue Daily Mail (guardian.co.uk)
• Facebook holds fire on panic button (guardian.co.uk)
• Want Facebook Chat On Your Pre? There Is A Patch For That! (jeffisageek.net)

Willie Fun Entertainment - Sponsored Post

Willie Fun Entertainment - www.williefun.com

Hey he is the best guy to have around to create the group's fun! He's the man!

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

MyDomain - Sponsored Post

MyDomain - www.mydomain.com

This is pretty reasonable. Would you consider this?
I think it is a real bargain, folks!

sponsored like

peter petterson's profile on MyLikes

Image via Wikipedia

Homophobia is sheer hypocrisy... 





Mississippi's Homophobic Prom.



High schools around the United States are currently preparing for the event that many students look forward to their entire high school careers: prom. But this year, there will be no prom for the Itawamba Agricultural High School in Fulton, Mississippi. Why?



School officials and school board members canceled the prom in order to prevent a lesbian student, 18-year-old Constance McMillen, from attending with her girlfriend.



After initially trying to ban just Constance and her date - an action that drew the threat of a lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) – the school decided to cancel the event for everyone rather than let the lesbian couple attend. That's right. No gay couples. No straight couples. No prom.



In response, people across the country have mobilized in support of Constance, who throughout this ordeal has stood up unashamed for who she is - and become a national hero for LGBT rights in the process. She now has hundreds of thousands of Facebook fans, and businesses volunteering to hold alternative proms for all Itawamba students to celebrate her courage in the face of discrimination.



There are also thousands of people taking action on Change.org, demanding that the Itawamba Agricultural High School change course and become a place where all students can enjoy events like prom - not just the straight ones. You can take action here.



As shocking as this episode is, the homophobia experienced by Constance is nothing new inside America's schools. Nationwide, nearly 90 percent of gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender students report that they've been victims of verbal abuse in school, and more than 40 percent say they've been physically harassed.



That's why one of the few openly gay members of Congress, Rep. Jared Polis, is trying to move forward a piece of legislation known as the Student Non-Discrimination Act, which would move our schools one step closer to becoming safe spaces for all students, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. You can help support his effort here.



Western society is under endless change, and sexual orientation seems to be another battle field which includes the nations high school children. Homophobia, despite one's own personal viewpoint, is becoming an evil within itself. Religion of whatever kind becomes  tainted with sheer  hypocricy.

Related articles by Zemanta

• The World Joins Constance McMillen To Say, Oh, Hell No, As Prom Offers Flood In For Mississippi Students (lezgetreal.com)
• As Expected, Classmates Blame Mississippi Lesbian Senior Constance McMillen For Prom's Cancellation (queerty.com)
• Dear Mississippi, THIS SUCKS! (perezhilton.com)
• Rather Than Let Constance McMillen Bring a Lesbian to Prom, Her Mississippi High School Canceled It (queerty.com)
• Constance McMillen's Lesbianism Cancelled Prom (brainz.org)
• School nixes prom over lesbian student (cnn.com)
• Why Can't This Mississippi Teen Bring a Date to Prom? Because She Wants to Bring Her Girlfriend, And Wear a Tux (queerty.com)

THE KIWI RIVERMAN POST

THE KIWI RIVERMAN POST

Image via Wikipedia

Forced marriages of under aged Muslim girls shockingly reported on  New Zealand television..
.

A documentary program on New Zealand television shockingly revealed  under age teenaged Muslim girls being forced into illegal marriages with older men in New Zealand. Such acts are common in other western countries, but until now were unknown by the general public here.



One girl has gone into hiding after being raped and forced by her despicable parents to "marry"the man.



Marriage is illegal under the age of 16 years in this country. Young people under 18 years need parental consent. The program dealt with cases of a 14 year old and a 15 year old forced to marry men by their parents. These people are Muslim refugees who are thumbing their noses at New Zealand law. New Zealand has generously given refuge to families from war-torn countries in southern Asia, the middle east and Africa. Is this is how they show their gratitude?



These people obviously consider NZ to be a soft touch. Mosque leaders deny any knowledge of these so-called marriages, but the various communities obviously know all about them. But they are undoubtably happening. Some girls are forced to go overseas to have a couple of children by their 'husbands'' to make them accept their situations.



The NZ Minister of Immigration denies there are the numbers to make any enquiries necessary about these so-called marriages. The British government which has concerns about forced marriages of children there, will make it a criminal offence to be a party to these marriages.


And that was how I wrote the above post on my community blogs earlier this week. New Zealand is a democratically elected secular society which does not have an "official' religion. Be that as it may, New Zealand is still basically a Christian society with many Christian religions: Roman Catholic, Protestant, Eastern Orthodox, and a variety of smaller religions and sects. As well as these NZ has many other religions such as Muslim, Hindu and many other asian originated religions. All members of these are permitted and encouraged to operate with freedom and respect for their congregations here in NZ. While we don't actually have an official religion, the Anglican Church (Church of England) is still the major religion here.

We have opened our doors to immigrants and refugees from many countries around the globe, and all we have asked is that they respect New Zealand society and culture as they would their own back in their home countries. Some  practices and behaviour have been questioned and answered by Islamic leaders as not being allowed by the Koran, but culturally acceptable in some countries. But they are not permitted under NZ law or culturally accepted here. These  despicable forced marriages will not be permitted, and those involved could be deported back to their own countries, or perhaps to some other Muslim countries, under certain cirumstances. New Zealand may have to follow the lead of the United Kingdom and make it an offence to be a party to illegal  forced "marriages" of children here. Of course such marriages cannot be recognised here because marriage is illegal under the age of 16 years , and those under 18 years must have parental consent.

Related articles by Zemanta

• NZ dumps gunsights with biblical verse (guardian.co.uk)
• New Zealand has bigots too (openparachute.wordpress.com)
• 100 US Anglican parishes convert to Roman Catholic Church (telegraph.co.uk)