Showing posts with label Labour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Labour. Show all posts

Sunday, October 10, 2010

England and Wales.Image via Wikipedia
 More black people jailed in England and Wales proportionally than the US... 



More black people jailed in England and Wales proportionally than in USNew study finds seven times more black people per population are in prison – in the US number is just four times as many

(

Randeep Ramesh, social affairs editor The Guardian, Monday 11 October 2010 Article history

The number of black people jailed in England and Wales is seven times larger than the amount they make up of the population. Photograph: i love images / Alamy/Alamy



The proportion of black people in prison in England and Wales is higher than in the United States, a landmark report released today by the Equality and Human Rights Commission reveals.



The commission's first triennial report into the subject, How Fair is Britain, shows that the proportion of people of African-Caribbean and African descent incarcerated here is almost seven times greater to their share of the population. In the United States, the proportion of black prisoners to population is about four times greater.



The report, which aims to set out how to measure "fairness" in Britain, says that ethnic minorities are "substantially over-represented in the custodial system". It suggests many of those jailed have "mental health issues, learning disabilities, have been in care or experienced abuse".



Experts and politicians said over-representation of black men was a result of decades of racial prejudice in the criminal justice system and an overly punitive approach to penal affairs.



"People will be and should be shocked by this data," said Juliet Lyon, director of the Prison Reform Trust. "We have a tendency to say we are better than the US, but we have not got prison right."



Lyon said that although there had been "numerous efforts to address racism in the prison system … we have yet to get a better relationship between justice authorities and black communities. Instead we have ended up with mistrust breeding mistrust."



Evidence of this damaged relationship can be found in the commission's report. On the streets, black people were subjected to what the report describes as an "excess" of 145,000 stop and searches in 2008. It notes that black people constitute less than 3% of the population, yet made up 15% of people stopped by police.



The commission found that five times more black people than white people per head of population in England and Wales are imprisoned. The ethnic minority prison population has doubled in a decade – from 11,332 in 1998 to 22,421 in 2008. Over a similar period, the overall number of prisoners rose by less than two thirds. The commission says that the total number of people behind bars accelerated in the last decade despite "a similar number of crimes being reported to the police as in the early 1990s … the volume of indictable offences has fallen over this time".



A quarter of the people in prison are from an ethnic minority. Muslims now make up 12% of the prison population in England and Wales.



Some on the left of the Labour party blame its policies while in power. Diane Abbott, who raised the alarm over the growing numbers of jailed black men as a backbencher, said she "very much regretted that the last Labour government swallowed [former home secretary] Michael Howard's line that 'prison works'."



"There was never a serious examination of the consequences of locking up a generation of young black men. The result is there are some prisons in the south east which are now virtually all black. Many are converting to Islam."



The problems may start at school. The commission points out that black children are three times as likely to be permanently excluded from education.



"We are reaping the effects of criminalising a community in the 1970s," says Ben Bowling, professor of criminal justice at Kings College London and a former adviser to the home affairs select committee.



"The question is how you break the cycle when young men experience custody. Three quarters simply re-offend. We have to intervene with families more effectively to stop kids going to prison. That means looking at school exclusions. You need to deal with issues like mental health and substance abuse. It is not enough to throw our hands in the air."



The policies implemented in the last decade mean incarceration levels in Britain are now among the highest in western Europe. England and Wales have an imprisonment rate of 155 per 100,000 and Scotland of 149 per 100,000 of the population. This contrasts with rates of less than 100 per 100,000 for most of Britain's neighbours.



The commission also warns of the rising numbers of women in jails. It says that the "number of women prisoners has nearly doubled since 1995 in England and Wales, and since 2000 in Scotland – currently around 5% of prisoners are women".



The Ministry of Justice said that the government would not comment on individual portions of the report.


Wednesday, August 18, 2010

John Key, leader of the New Zealand National PartyImage via WikipediaNew Zealand MPs given a conscience vote on the legal drinking age would probably allow 18-year-olds into bars and pubs but return the off-licence purchase age to 20...


The National Party caucus yesterday decided that the vote on raising the drinking or alcohol purchase age from 18 to 20 will be up to individual MPs in a conscience vote.



But National would vote as a party on other alcohol reforms in legislation expected to have its first reading late this year.



The caucus meeting also decided that any votes on drink-driving laws, including Labour MP Darren Hughes' private member's bill to reduce the blood-alcohol limit, would also be along party lines rather than a conscience vote as suggested by Prime Minister John Key last week.



Asked how they intended to vote on the alcohol purchase age, many MPs, including Mr Key and Opposition leader Phil Goff, said they were likely to vote for a split age which would keep the purchase age on licensed premises at 18, but raise the purchase age at liquor stores, supermarkets and other off-licence premises to 20.



Mr Goff also said it would be up to each Labour MP how they voted on the drinking age, but he supported a split age because it was better to have 18 and 19-year-olds drinking under supervision rather "than out of the back of a car in a reserve somewhere".





Of 44 MPs who expressed a preference on the subject to 3 News, 29 favoured the 18/20 split, seven preferred keeping the age at 18 and eight favoured returning it to 20.



Labour MP Lianne Dalziel, who will be leading her party's response to the Government's alcohol reform legislation, also favoured the split.



"It takes the debate away from the age which is not so much the issue but whether people are drinking in a supervised versus unsupervised environment."



Other considerations included alcohol prices, outlets and access to takeaway alcohol.



"If we don't have a debate about accessibility and have a debate only about age, we will not fix the problem."



Mr Hughes said he was disappointed the Government would not allow a conscience vote on his bill - which would lower the drink-drive limit from 0.08 grams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood to 0.05 - if it was drawn out of the ballot.



"It would have been great to have all the politics put aside and National MPs voting for it as well."



But Mr Joyce said Mr Hughes was "playing politics" himself.



"This is a party that had nine years to make some changes in this area ... and they didn't bother and now it's the most urgent thing since sliced bread."



Mr Joyce said National's caucus felt the Government had made a call to revisit the issue in two years once additional research had been completed "and they were keen to back the decision with a party vote".



Other drink-driving measures planned by the Government included a zero drink-drive limit for recidivist drink-drivers and drivers under 20 years of age and tougher penalties for people who drink and drive causing death.



National would also look at alcohol interlocks for repeat drink-drive offenders.



THE NUMBERS



*44 MPs polled



*29 preferred the 18/20 split for clubs and off-licences



*8 preferred raising age to 20 for both



*7 wanted age kept at 18

But the New Zealand public may want the age increased to 20 years for all drinking, as it was before the last drinking law changes in 1999. Their opinion could be interesting, one year out from the next elections.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, March 26, 2010

Richard John Seddon, Prime Minister of New Zea...Image via Wikipedia
Will Australai and New Zealand amalgamate, is it inevitable...



Australia and NZ merger 'inevitable'? Perhaps, but such a discussion would not be an isolated one; it would be be part of a wider discussion on republicanism.




Part One:  Polls and opinion







Some 40 per cent of Kiwis supported a debate about New Zealand becoming a state of Australia. Photo / Steven McNicholFormer Commonwealth Secretary-General Don McKinnon believes a merger with Australia is inevitable.



A recent poll has found 40 per cent of New Zealanders support a debate about becoming a state of Australia.



The UMR Research poll surveyed a thousand people on both sides of the Tasman.



Approximately a quarter of Kiwis favoured the country becoming part of the Australia with 71% opposed to the idea.



37% of Australian respondents supported the merger, compared 52% against it.



Sir Don - who is also a former Foreign Affairs Minister and chair of the Trans-Tasman Business Circle - told TVNZ's Q&A programme that it was just a matter of time before a formal agreement is reached with Australia.



"We've got nearly half a million New Zealanders living in Australia anyway," he said.



"By the time the next generation comes around, technology and the movement of people everywhere, New Zealanders won't want to be in the situation of paying taxes in both countries and all the time going through immigration and Customs.





They'll want to try to eliminate all those things."



Sir Don believes the shift will be people-driven, rather then politically motivated.



"It's a debate that's going to go on, but no political leader in New Zealand is going to win an election advocating this issue."



But Labour party leader Phil Goff said there was no reason for a union with Australia.



He said although Australia had nothing to lose from it, joining with a much larger country would mean giving up our national identity.



"New Zealanders are proud of their culture, they are proud of their history, they are proud of their sense of identity."



He said working towards a single economic market between the countries could be achieved without a merger.



"When we can get the benefits of a closer economic relationship and a single economic market, what are the additional benefits of simply being the seventh state?



"It's about making decisions in New Zealand for New Zealanders by New Zealanders that really matter. We can have a closer relationship, we can get the best of both worlds. Submerging ourselves into Australia is not required to achieve that."



Former Prime Minister Mike Moore said New Zealand simply had to "toughen up".



"We will not solve our economic problems by becoming a state or two states of Australia."




Part Two:  The Kiwi Riverman's opinion:



The above report is an interesting one. But as I said from the commencement of this post, such a discussion would be part of a wider discussion on the merits of republicanism. Australia will drive this discussion, and New Zealand would have to consider whether it could continue on on its own. When, not if,  New Zealand as a society decides its future, the discussion will move to one of a merger with Australia.

 It wouldn't be a simple merger as another state of Australia, but how New Zealand would fit in with a future expanding Australia. There could well be two states, or even three when considering Auckland's role. Auckland is becoming a "city state" with a quarter of New Zealand's population. The South Island is slowly becoming a different entity to the North Island. And its true that over a half a million New Zealanders already reside in Australia.

We should consider the origination of the Commonwealth of Australia: It was originally conceived as a "Commonwealth of Australasia", but the then Premier of New Zealand, Richard Seddon, pulled NZ out of the colony  amalgamation discussions and our country went on to become a dominion on its own. Australia became the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901, and New Zealand  became a dominion a few years later. But of course neither country really becoame fully self-governing for a few years after that.

And the matter of a republic? There will be a bit more water flowing under the bridge yet; New Zealand is actually in the process of discussing the merits of a new flag, but this is actually premature when considering the possibility of an amalgamation of the two countries, and of course the republic matter itself.

 New Zealand would have to consider the future of a number of pacific islands first: the Cooks Islands are  technically part of New Zealand, Niue and  Tokelau are territories and Samoa is getting closer to NZ every year as more and more Samoans become  resident in the country. So there is more to consider than a straight amalgamation with Australia. There could well be a consideration for an Oceanic republic.


Acknowledgements:  Newstalk ZB, NZ Herald, Peter Petterson.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]