Tuesday, August 14, 2012

The Riverman Reports ...: Australian Government beats Big Tobacco in the Cou...

The Riverman Reports ...: Australian Government beats Big Tobacco in the Cou...: Tobacco loses: Australian court upholds world’s toughest marketing law Still from a video by YouTube user...

Australian Government beats Big Tobacco in the Court...



Tobacco loses: Australian court upholds world’s toughest marketing law

Still from a video by YouTube user NTDTV
Still from a video by YouTube user NTDTV


A challenge to a law requiring that tobacco companies drop branding and colors from cigarette packets has been dismissed in Australia. As it stands, the world’s toughest tobacco marketing law is due to come into effect later this year.
­Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, which is expected to come into effect before the end of the year, requires that tobacco producers drop all color and clearly visible logos from their products’ packaging, instead selling them in uniform olive green packs displaying graphic health warnings.
The package is required to prominently feature health warnings and images of cancerous mouths, blind eyes and sickly children, while the brand names would be printed in a small, uniform font.
A group of tobacco giants – including Philip Morris, British American Tobacco, Britain's Imperial Tobacco, and Japan Tobacco – claimed that the law was unconstitutional because it effectively stripped them of their intellectual property rights.
On Wednesday, the court ruled that anti-tobacco laws were legal and did not breach any trademark rights.
“The plaintiffs argued that some or all of the provisions of the Act were invalid because they were an acquisition of the plaintiffs' property otherwise than on just terms,” the court’s brief statement read. “At least a majority of the Court is of the opinion that the Act is not contrary to [Australia’s constitution].”
The court is expected to publish its full judgment and reasons for the decision at a “later date.”
The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act was passed in 2011 in an effort to further reduce the number of smokers in Australia.

The Riverman Reports ...: Kiwi hero Willie Apiata VC quits NZ defence force ...

The Riverman Reports ...: Kiwi hero Willie Apiata VC quits NZ defence force ...:   Maybe Apiata's departure relates to pay and conditions - the rest of the Armed Forces are certainly complaining ...

Kiwi hero Willie Apiata VC quits NZ defence force like 900 others - whats going on?




 
Maybe Apiata's departure relates to pay and conditions - the rest of the Armed Forces are certainly complaining

Maybe Apiata's departure relates to pay and conditions - the rest of the Armed Forces are certainly complaining

Opinion by Political Reporter Patrick Gower
There could hardly be a worse advertisement for the New Zealand Defence Force right now.
Willie Apiata, VC, quits - and doesn't even get so much as a goodbye from the top brass.
Yes, the Army's poster boy just walked on out - like over 900 other servicemen and women have in the past two years.
It goes like this - morale is in the doldrums, there's a pay freeze and the Government's cost-cutting reforms have really hurt.
All this adds up to people just not wanting to work for the armed forces as much as they used to.
And now the departed includes none other than Willie Apiata - just how symbolic is that?
His departure from the SAS was broken to the public by a muttering Defence Minister on the way to Parliament yesterday.
The Defence Force then rushed out a bland statement - I strongly suspect they did not know what to say.
And finally it put something out on behalf of Apiata himself.
It was all very disorganised - there was certainly no military-style precision.
It all points to there being some deeper issue to Apiata's departure.
As the rumour mill has it, he's been arguing over getting some extra leave to be with his family (denied by the Government).
And then there are rumours about discipline issues and the like (also denied by the Government) that always circulate when there's a rushed departure like this.
The nature of the release does nothing to quell those - and when they are not true it's simply not fair on Apiata.
Or maybe Apiata's departure relates to pay and conditions - the rest of the Armed Forces are certainly complaining.
Are our SAS and the associated special forces’ soldiers remunerated properly?
Do the SAS have the right numbers to ward off attrition issues?
Are there the right pathways for experienced career soldiers like Apiata to stay in the services?
I'm really surprised there was no exit strategy for Apiata.
There's no special role designated for him, no matter how small to keep him attached to the forces - for want of a better description, some sort of "cushy retirement number".

Apiata is going to work for the High Wire Trust - it works with troubled youth.
But the Government/Army has its own programme - the so-called "boot camps". Wouldn't Apiata have been the ideal man for this?
A roving role up and down the country - he could have been put in a "civilianised role" and paid a decent wedge.
Clearly the Army had no plan for dealing with Apiata - its been a shambles.
And the very least, they should have given him some sort of send-off where he could extol the virtues of a career as a soldier.
Maybe the Defence Force muzzled him because they didn't want media asking about morale and pay issues?
It's clear that Apiata still loves the SAS - he's staying on as a reserve.
Maybe he didn't want a big send-off - but that doesn't stop something a little more organised than yesterday.
And what about the amount the Defence Force has pumped into the marketing and PR "brand Willie"? On those grounds alone it's a loss to the balance sheet.
The clumsy goodbye to Apiata is not a good look.
Put it this way: I can't see the NZRFU acting like this when Richie McCaw finally calls it a day.
Whatever the reasons behind this, Apiata's final salute from the top brass was not befitting of the great man's deeds.
----
Response from Chief of Defence Force Lieutenant General Rhys Jones:
Patrick, I can assure you and the public of New Zealand that Corporal Apiata, V.C. will get the send-off from the Defence Force that HE wants.
I think if the New Zealand public has learnt anything about Willie since he rose to prominence for his remarkable act of gallantry, it is that Willie is an incredibly humble man who has never sought the spotlight for himself.
Where he has made public appearances and supported causes, these have been where he sensed he could make a difference to his community and New Zealand.
So too it is in the way he wishes to leave the Defence Force. As Defence Force leaders we will first and foremost be guided by Willie’s own wishes to make the transition to his new role beyond the Defence Force in his own quiet and deliberate way.
As Chief of Defence Force, I believe he has earned that right. As to the “rushed” way you claim the NZ Defence Force handled this issue, our statement was of course in response to imminent news media stories we became aware of.
It was not the Defence Force that sought to initiate a story but your own brethren. Again, our statement was in accordance with Willie’s wishes.
With regard to the other innuendo and gossip you speculate about in your “opinion piece”, all I can do is refer you again to the statement that Corporal Apiata, V.C. made through the Defence Force yesterday afternoon.
As regularly voted one of New Zealand’s “most trusted New Zealanders”, I hope Patrick that you will take Willie’s word on this matter - if not my own - that he left his fulltime military role under good terms, and will continue his long association with the Defence Force as a Reserve Force member:
“This has been a decision that I have not taken lightly and it is one that has taken me many months to make. I am leaving to pursue my goals and to grow with my family. I am very proud of my service with the NZDF and I am very grateful for all of the support I have received from the NZSAS and the NZDF.”


Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/Opinion-Apiata-disgraced-by-Defence-Force-top-brass/tabid/1382/articleID/261847/Default.aspx#ixzz23V5o1ZeW

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Internet freedom in the land of the free?

Invite Friends
Petition-xPeter Petterson


The open Internet is central to people's freedom to communicate, share, advocate and innovate in the 21st century. But powerful interests want to censor free speech, block the sharing of information, hinder innovation and control how Internet users get online. All too often, people in power are making political decisions behind closed doors about how the Internet should operate — and they're doing this without the involvement of actual Internet users. The result is policies that could close down the open Internet and destroy our freedom to connect.

Furthermore, corporations and their allies in government have repeatedly sought to create policies that would give them control over what we do, say, read and watch online. The push to pass SOPA and PIPA was simply one of the more high-visible examples of this. While it's always important to beat back these threats when they occur, we also need to be proactive to protect the free and open Internet. That means supporting positive visions like the one embodied in the Declaration of Internet Freedom.

The Declaration was drafted by a coalition of dozens of organizations, companies and individuals — including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Free Press, Mozilla and the Center for Democracy & Technology — that played key roles in the fight to stop SOPA and PIPA, two anti-piracy bills that would have irrevocably harmed the open Internet. This coalition is diverse and post-partisan. It reflects many different viewpoints, political persuasions and geographic world views.

Join in the fight for our online rights. Keeping the Internet free and open means more jobs, more innovation, more creativity and more political engagement. It is essential to free speech around the world and we must take a stand now!

For more information, check out these sites:
http://www.internetdeclaration.org/
http://www.savetheinternet.com/resource/98843/what-declaration-internet-freedom
https://www.eff.org/
http://www.freepress.net/
http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/
https://www.cdt.org/

Friday, August 10, 2012

FBI alleged Dotcom doomsday device justified counter-terrorism raid in NZ...

 


 

 


FBI believed Kim Dotcom had a ‘doomsday device’ capable of erasing all piracy evidence

Sane people may be wondering why the New Zealand government utilized its elite counterterrorism unit to raid Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom’s mansion. And now, via the NZ Herald, we have our answer: the FBI actually believed Dotcom had a Dr. Strangelove-style “doomsday device” that was capable of wiping out all evidence of Internet piracy with the flick of a switch.
During a judicial review of the raid at the High Court at Auckland on Friday, raid supervisor Detective Inspector Grant Wormald testified that the FBI told him that Dotcom “carried a device with him to delete servers around the world” that could be set off within seconds from multiple computers, laptops and smartphones within Dotcom’s mansion.
Needless to say, no such device existed and the New Zealand Special Tactics Group came up empty in their search for it. In response to these revelations, Dotcom’s attorney Paul Davison called the raid on his client’s mansion “a woefully incompetent and inept performance by the New Zealand police at all stages and at all levels.”

Thursday, August 09, 2012

Monsanto PR Campaign on college campus gets served


YouTube - NotForSale2NWO

Bob Tuskin reports live from the University of Florida Campus as activists present Monsanto with a lawsuit from 'We the People.'

After finding out that Monsanto had setup a PR campaign on campus, we decided to counter with truth.

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/monsanto-pr-campaign-on-college-campus.html

Monday, July 30, 2012

The "Book of Esther" a gift to Obama from Netanyahu...

 

Netanyahu's "Book of Esther" gift for Obama a pointed reminder of Iran's 'annihilation' threat...

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/07/netanyhus-book-of-esther-gift-for-obama-a-pointed-reminder-of-iran-threat/

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Cuba ready to come in out of the cold and mend their fences with the US...




Cuba is willing to mend fences with Cold War foe the United States, says President Raul Castro.
At the end of a Revolution Day ceremony marking the 59th anniversary of a failed uprising against a military barracks, Castro on Thursday grabbed the microphone for apparently impromptu remarks.
He echoed previous statements that no topic was off-limits, including US concerns about democracy, freedom of the press and human rights on the island, as long as it is a conversation between equals.

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/14381481/cuba-ready-to-mend-fences-with-us/

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Obama's war on medical marijuana just got even uglier - who is his adviser on this one?



"Obama's War On Medical Marijuana Just Got Even Uglier"

Scott Morgan
Stop The Drug War

One month ago, Eric Holder testified before Congress that the Dept. of Justice is only targeting medical marijuana businesses that violate their state's laws. Anyone who didn't realize it was a lie should be getting the message right about now.
The federal government is moving to shut down the nation's largest and highest-profile medical marijuana dispensary operation, filing papers to seize properties in Oakland and San Jose where Harborside Health Center does business.
Copies of the federal Complaint for Forfeiture were taped to the front doors of the two dispensaries Tuesday, alleging that they were "operating in violation of federal law."
Medical marijuana advocates, as well as some state and local officials, decried the action, saying it hurts patients in legitimate need of the drug and breaks repeated promises by President Obama's Justice Department that it was targeting only operations near schools and parks or otherwise in violation of the state's laws. [LA Times]
They're not even pretending it's about state law anymore. Harborside has a permit from the City of Oakland and pays millions in taxes to the state of California. They've been covered extensively in the press, and featured on the Discovery Channel program "Weed Wars". Everyone knows exactly what goes on inside Harborside because we've seen it with our own eyes: they provide high-quality medical cannabis and other services to qualified patients. This is the definition of a legal and well-regulated medical



http://www.activistpost.com/2012/07/obamas-war-on-medical-marijuana-just.html

Wednesday, July 04, 2012

Thousands to lose Internet access as FBI shuts down services....

 

 

Blackout looming: Thousands to lose Internet access as FBI shuts down servers

A Server Not Found error message on the Mozilla Firefox Internet browser.
A Server Not Found error message on the Mozilla Firefox Internet browser.

­On July 9, thousands of Internet users worldwide could lose access after the FBI shuts down temporary DNS servers that replaced fraudulent servers operated by hackers.
Major companies and US government agencies are amongst those that could be blocked out, according to the Internet security firm IID.
The blackout will affect systems infected with the DNSChanger Trojan, a malware program that altered user searches and redirected them to pages offering fraudulent and, in some cases, dangerous products.
Last November the FBI arrested and charged six Estonian men behind the malware as part of Operation Ghost Click. These hackers were able to make a fortune off their project, raking in millions for ads placed on their fraudulent websites.
On the eve of the arrests, the FBI hired Paul Vixie, chairman of the Internet Systems Consortium (ISC) to install two temporary Internet servers that would prevent infected users from losing access to the Internet once the DNSChanger botnet was shut down. These users were advised to take steps to get rid of the malware on their computers, and the DNSChanger Working Group was set up by the computer industry and law enforcement to come up with a plan to phase out the surrogate servers.
The FBI was initially planning to shut down their provisional servers in March, but a US district court ruled the provisional servers were to remain operation until July 9.
Running the temporary servers for eight months has cost the FBI $87,000.
With the looming deadline approaching, estimates suggest up to 360,000 unique Internet addresses are still using the rogue servers, with most of them based in the US, according to federal authorities. Other countries with over 20,000 each include Italy, Canada, India, the United Kingdom and Germany. This is down from the over half a million addresses registered when the six hackers were arrested, but still enough to paralyze the functioning of important websites. At its peak several years ago, up to six million systems worldwide were infected with the malware.
The DNS system is a network of servers that translates a web address into a numerical IP address used by computers. Computers affected by the DNSChanger worm were reprogrammed to access rogue DNS servers that redirected them to fraudulent websites.

http://www.rt.com/news/fbi-internet-dnschanger-shutdown-440/

Tuesday, July 03, 2012

NZ's anti-nuclear policy keeps NZ navy out of Pearl Harbour - why bother Kiwis...


HONOLULU — The New Zealand Defence Force, marking its first participation in Rim of the Pacific naval exercises in 28 years, has sent a frigate, a tanker and other war-fighting elements to Honolulu for the world's largest international naval exercises.
"They are certainly integrated into all the events. They are hosting a reception — just like many of the other ships are," said RIMPAC spokesman U.S. Navy Cmdr. Charlie Brown.
Just not in Pearl Harbor, where the rest of the 42 participating surface ships from 11 nations will be.
Altogether, 22 nations, six submarines, more than 200 aircraft and 25,000 personnel are participating in the largest RIMPAC ever, running through July and into early August.
But a nearly three-decade quarrel over New Zealand's anti-nuclear posture still prevents the Kiwi frigate Te Kaha and tanker Endeavour from stopping in Pearl Harbor, just as U.S. Navy ships are not allowed to make port calls in New Zealand.
Instead, the two gray warships — the 387-foot Te Kaha, a 5-inch turret gun pointing off its bow, and the 452-foot Endeavour — are snuggled up side by side next to touristy Aloha Tower behind some flowering plumeria trees.
"Closer to town. We're not complaining," said one of the New Zealand sailors, adding, "This is the biggest thing we've done in a long time."
Even former Cold War foe the Russians, participating in RIMPAC for the first time, will be allowed to berth in Pearl Harbor, the U.S. Navy said.
Military-to-military relations between the United States and New Zealand have been on the upswing since at least 2003, and in 2010, a milestone "strategic partnership" agreement, the Wellington Declaration, was reached.

The two countries on June 19 signed what's known as the Washington Declaration at the Pentagon expanding the defense relationship. Changing power dynamics with China exerting its influence in the region have propelled the defense relationship forward.

Joint training has increased, with 75 U.S. Marines and soldiers taking part in the exercise Alam Halfa with 1,500 New Zealand troops in that country in April, and New Zealand engineers recently visiting Camp Pendleton, Calif.

But the ship-porting standoff over New Zealand's nuclear posture, which U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill called "a bit of a relic" in 2006, remains in effect.

"The U.S. is thankful for the long-standing partnership with New Zealand and though the recent signing of the Washington Declaration is a great sign of our cooperation, we do not agree on everything," said Army Maj. Cathy Wilkinson, a Pentagon spokeswoman.
In 1985, citing its nuclear-free policy, New Zealand denied port access to the American destroyer Buchanan because the Navy would neither confirm nor deny that the ship was nuclear armed.
The United States said it was suspending its security obligations to New Zealand under what was known as the ANZUS treaty (Australia, New Zealand, United States) until U.S. Navy ships were readmitted to Kiwi ports, and it ended most bilateral activities.
Wilkinson said that while the nuclear-free policy remains, the 2010 Wellington Declaration "established a new framework for an expanded relationship and nearly normalized the relationship."
"We continue to partner within existing limitations, which include not allowing New Zealand Navy ships to visit U.S. military ports," she said.

John Pike, director of Virginia-based think tank GlobalSecurity.org, said the new defense relationship with New Zealand "is a considerable improvement over what we had when all of this nuclear allergy stuff started a quarter of a century ago."

"We had been in the Great War with the Kiwis and we had licked the Japanese with the Kiwis and we had been together against the Soviets with the Kiwis — until this whole nuclear thing came up," Pike said.

The fact that the U.S. Navy will neither confirm nor deny whether its ships have nuclear weapons aboard "is the thing that they (New Zealand) can't cope with," Pike said. "The reality, of course, is that occasionally, aircraft carriers have (nuclear) gravity bombs on them, but otherwise, the senior Bush administration took all the nuclear weapons out of the surface Navy 20 years ago."
New Zealand P-3 aircraft and an infantry unit will be housed at the Marine Corps base at Kaneohe Bay, and a mine countermeasure team will be at Pearl Harbor.

The two New Zealand warships, which are expected to remain at Aloha Tower until July 11, will get some company from the Hawaii-based frigate USS Crommelin, the "host ship" for the New Zealanders, so "the crews can join together in opportunities to enjoy Hawaii and build friendships and partnerships," the Navy said.

A case of the Kiwis having their meals in the kitchen, not out in the dining room with the Ruskies and others.

American vessels with nuclear weapons will not be allowed into NZ ports. Leave them in Sydney Harbour and fly over the Tasman with Air New Zealand for some R & R.

But at the end of the day, who really gives a stuff!

Thursday, June 28, 2012

The internet is part of the global information community - not the private realm of the United States...





:no:
300px-FBISeal601387_10151803817890013_828394883_n195759_203919186299066_3013455_n
Prison for linking to a website; you would have to be joking? But you are not joking!


  • Jimmy Wales created Wikipedia. Now he's created a petition to stop the U.K. from sending a 24-year-old Internet entrepreneur to the US to be prosecuted for linking to TV shows on his website.
    Two years ago, Richard O'Dwyer was in his second year of college in the U.K. In his spare time he ran a website that acted as a search engine for users to find links to watch TV and movies online.
    He respected the rules -- deleting content when he received requests to remove it. But despite this, he’s now been accused of copyright violation and could face 10 years in a U.S. prison, after the British Home Secretary, Theresa May, signed an extradition order in March.
    Richard is not a U.S. citizen, he's lived in the U.K. all his life, his site was not hosted there, and most of his users were not from the U.S. The U.S. is trying to prosecute a U.K. citizen for an alleged crime which took place on U.K. soil.
    Given the thin case against him, it is an outrage that he is being extradited to the U.S. to face charges. That's why I've just launched a petition on Change.org to stop his extradition -- and why I hope you will sign it today. Click here to sign the petition.
    When I met Richard, he struck me as a clean-cut, geeky kid. Still a student, he reminds me of many great entrepreneurs and the kind of person I can imagine launching the next Wikipedia or YouTube.
    Copyright matters but from the beginning of the internet, we have seen a struggle between the interests of the "content industry" and the general public.
    Richard is the human face of that battle, and if he's extradited and convicted, he will bear the very real human cost.
    The internet as a whole must not tolerate censorship as a response to mere allegations of copyright infringement. As citizens we must stand up for our rights online.
    Together, the public won the battle against SOPA and PIPA. We proved that when we work together we can protect freedom on the internet. Together, I know we can win this battle too.
    Join me and sign my petition to stop the extradition of UK citizen Richard O'Dwyer.
    Thanks,
    - Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia Founder (Link below)

  • This story has so many similarities to the Kim Dotcom controversy in New New Zealand. Mr Dotcom has to face an extradition order hearing in August. Like Richard O'Dwyer, Mr Dotcom is not an American citizen and does not have an American based website. Just in recent days the New Zealand High court has come out in favour of Kim Dotcom - declaring the charges against him invalid and the police raid and confiscation of his property illegal. One would get the impression that the United States thinks it owns the internet - they don't, it is a global source of information. It is important that the global community sends a message to the United States. Their censorship of the internet must be stopped.

  • Peter Petterson
    Wellington
    New Zealand

  • http://nz.mg261.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.partner=tnz&.rand=9mr43g8jp1drk
  • Kiwipete

NZ Judge declares Kim Dotcom FBI initiated police raid and searches illegal and invalid...

Kim Dotcom outside court earlier this year. Photo / File
Expand

Kim Dotcom outside court earlier this year. Photo / File

The High Court has ruled the police raid on internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom's Auckland mansion was illegal and the removal from New Zealand of cloned copies of hard drives seized was unlawful.
Justice Helen Winkelmann found the warrants used did not adequately describe the offences to which they were related.
"Indeed they fell well short of that. They were general warrants, and as such, are invalid.''
Police said they were considering the judgement and are in discussions with Crown Law to determine what further action might be required.
They would not make any comment until that process was complete.
Justice Winkelmann's judgement released a short time ago found the warrants were far too wide in terms of the scope of the search and the amount of items they gave police authority to seize.
"These categories of items were defined in such a way that they would inevitably capture within them both relevant and irrelevant material. The police acted on this authorisation. The warrants could not authorise seizure of irrelevant material, and are therefore invalid.''
The cloning of Dotcom's hard drives by the FBI, who took the copied disks back to the US was also ruled as invalid because Dotcom had never given consent.
The court ordered an independent lawyer to review everything seized in the raid to determine what is relevant to the investigation and what is not.
Relevant material is to be released to US authorities and everything else is be returned to Dotcom "forthwith''.
The decision followed a hearing at the High Court in Auckland last month.
Kim Dotcom cried in court as his lawyer spoke of how he was ``ripped from his family'' during a dawn raid by police at the request of US authorities.
Dotcom, who was arrested alongside three associates, had argued for copies of the data on 135 computers and hard drives seized when police raided his $30 million home in Coatesville.
His lawyer Paul Davison QC said his client's rights had been "subverted'' after cloned copies of the hard drives were taken overseas by the FBI without his lawyers knowing.
Mr Davison told the court he wrote to Crown lawyers in February to ask that none of the data from Dotcom's computers leave New Zealand.
Mr Davison said Crown lawyers responded, saying: "The evidence is required in its original form to be sent to the US. That has not happened and will not happen without prior warning.''
He said he was told the FBI had been in New Zealand and made clones of the data on the computers and one copy would be made available to him.

Mr Davison said he had yet to receive that copy and was only told today that copies had been sent to the US.
"There has been no approval for removal.''
Mr Davison also said there had been an "excess of authority''.
"Here is an example of what I would submit at the most moderate was high-handed and at the worst misleading.''
He said the process was "off the rails'' and his client's rights had been "subverted''.
Dotcom wiped tears from his eyes and left court as Mr Davison said his client had been "ripped from his family'' and was now before the court asking for the legitimacy of the police actions to be looked at.
Justice Helen Winkelmann said she wanted an affidavit from Crown lawyers that would clarify whether or not the Solicitor General gave police permission to allow copies of the data on Dotcom's computers to be taken to the US.
Crown lawyer Mike Ruffin said the original police search warrant, signed by a district court judge, made it clear that the computers and hard drives would be taken to the US.
He said a proposal by Dotcom to have a judicial review of the information was "not practical because of the volume of the data''.
Mr Ruffin said copies of Dotcom's computers and hard drives could not be handed over because investigators were not yet able to determine what is relevant to the case and what is not.
Dotcom faces an extradition hearing in August which will determine whether or not he is to fly to the US to face charges including copyright infringement and wire fraud relating to the file-sharing website Megaupload.
Prosecutors allege a "mega conspiracy''; Dotcom denies the charges and says his website was legitimate.
Acknowledgements:  - APNZ
Enhanced by Zemanta